Keystone XL —- Groups Demand More Time and Public Say

Groups Demand More Time and Public Say in Keystone XL Pipeline Review. Conservation groups urge State Dept to hold meetings in at least 24 communities along Keystone XL’s route before issuing its environmental review. Any day now, it’s expected the U.S. State Department will be releasing a revamped version of its environmental review of the much-disputed Keystone XL oil sands pipeline. And local and national advocacy organizations want to be sure those along the proposed six-state route from Alberta, Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast receive the opportunity to offer feedback. A coalition of 32 groups sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton this week asking her to extend the usual public comment period from 45 to 120 days and to organize on-the-ground public hearings in Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas. While those groups await a response, an Oregon Democrat who serves on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee has asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate whether Canadian oil companies are violating antitrust rules with their agreement to ship heavy crude along Keystone XL. Sen. Ron Wyden said in a news release that he is concerned that this arrangement will drive up prices of Canadian oil sands crude in the Midwest, meaning drivers will pay more at the pump. Among those signing the letter to Clinton are the Center for Biological Diversity, Indigenous Environmental Network, League of Conservation Voters, Public Citizen Texas, Western Organization of Resource Councils, National Wildlife Foundation, Corporate Ethics International, Bold Nebraska, Sierra Club and Friends of the Earth. “Pipelines spill, and this pipeline would be carrying some of the dirtiest oil on Earth, putting the water, air and farmland of communities at risk,” Alex Moore of Friends of the Earth said. “Secretary Clinton must not approach the supplemental analysis as another thing to cross off the list. She should listen seriously to the public’s concerns.” The conservation groups are requesting that Clinton’s team organize meetings in at least 24 communities along the Keystone XL right-of-way. “We feel it would not be in the spirit of NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) or in the spirit of the Administration’s commitment to transparency and public engagement to move ahead,” they wrote in the April 4 letter, “without allowing these communities the opportunity to provide their comments to and ask questions of the officials conducting the permitting review in a public forum.” First EIS Came Up Short. Last July, the Environmental Protection Agency gave the State Department’s draft environmental impact statement its lowest possible ranking: “inadequate.” Deficiencies they cited included a lack of accounting for greenhouse gas emissions, safety and spill-response planning and inattentiveness to the potential impact on Canada’s indigenous communities. That criticism prompted Clinton’s team to begin preparing what’s known as a supplemental environmental impact statement on Keystone XL. Calgary-based TransCanada wants to construct the 1,702-mile underground pipeline to carry heavy crude oil from the tar sands mines in its home province of Alberta to oil refineries along the Gulf of Mexico. The $7 billion pipeline system has the potential to double — or perhaps triple — the amount of diluted bitumen flowing to the U.S. from its northern neighbor, though critics say an increase in pipeline capacity likely won’t be needed until 2025 or 2030. Between 2000 and 2010, U.S. imports of diluted bitumen grew five-fold from 100,000 to 500,000 barrels per day. That number could balloon to 1.5 million barrels per day by 2019. ((07 APR 2011))

http://solveclimatenews.com/news/20110407/public-keystone-xl-pipeline-environmental-review-clinton

————————————————————————————————————

01
http://www.metronews.ca/toronto/life/article/826479–u-s-mayors-want-dirty-oil-election-talk

02
http://www.care2.com/news/member/864072146/2770075

03
http://tangledwing.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/radiant-ocean-evening-wallpaper-canadian-oil-imports-are-much-more-dangerous-than-wed-like-to-believe/

04
http://madvilletimes.com/2011/04/landowners-call-on-president-to-stop-keystone-xl/

05
http://blogs.cfr.org/levi/2011/04/08/the-unenlightening-oiltar-sands-debate/

06
http://michiganmessenger.com/47862/landowners-express-concerns-over-keystone-pipeline

07
http://climbingoutofthedark.blogspot.com/2011/04/alberta-quiet-now-soon-to-erupt.html

08
http://current.com/news/93139139_albertas-liepert-urges-u-s-to-sign-the-bloody-order-on-oilsands-pipeline.htm?xid=RSSfeed

==================================================================================

01
https://gheorghe47.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/keystone-xl-landowners-fear-spills/

02
https://gheorghe47.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/keystone-xl-more-input-sought/

03
https://gheorghe47.wordpress.com/2011/03/02/keystone-xl-transcanada-accused-of-pushing-people-around/

04
https://gheorghe47.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/keystone-xl-standing-room-only-at-nebraska-meeting/

05
https://gheorghe47.wordpress.com/2011/02/06/keystone-xl-more-debate-than-harper-obama-border-declaration/

06
https://gheorghe47.wordpress.com/2011/02/05/keystone-xl-controversy-over-meaning-and-timing-of-report/

07
https://gheorghe47.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/keystone-xl-hillary-clinton-and-the-pipeline-lobbyist-watchdog-groups-file-appeal/

08
https://gheorghe47.wordpress.com/2011/01/24/keystone-xl-texans-resent-being-pushed-around/

09
https://gheorghe47.wordpress.com/2011/01/14/nebraska-bill-would-shackle-oil-pipeline/

10
https://gheorghe47.wordpress.com/2010/11/25/dubas-to-lead-legislative-study-on-proposed-oil-pipeline/

11
https://gheorghe47.wordpress.com/2010/11/18/hundreds-of-concerned-citizens-protest-poison-tar-sands-oil-pipeline/

==================================================================================


GO TO FRONT PAGE

Advertisements

About this entry